Header Photo: Fort Augustaburg Teshie Nungua 1890, The National Archives, UK / Text below: Remo Kurka
Ties to Abolition and Early Human Rights: Fort Augustaborg in Context - Fort Teshie or named also Fort Augustaborg, completed in 1787 on the Teshie coastline, arrived late in the era of European fort-building on the Gold Coast. By then, the transatlantic slave trade was nearing its official decline — though far from over in practice. Built by the Danes for commerce and strategic coastal control, the fort’s lifespan overlapped a crucial ideological turning point in European colonial thinking: the beginning of the end for the Atlantic slave trade.
Denmark-Norway, the dual monarchy under which the fort operated, would soon become the first European power to ban the transatlantic slave trade, formally declaring its abolition in 1792, with enforcement beginning in 1803. This made the Danish presence in West Africa — and Fort Augustaborg in particular — a rare instance of a slave-trading infrastructure still physically intact while the moral and political tides in Europe were starting to shift.
This legal turn was not an act of sudden conscience. Rather, it was the product of Enlightenment-era debates about human rights, labor, and empire. Danish-Norwegian thinkers such as Hans Christian Knudsen, a poet and essayist, openly criticized the brutality of the slave trade, referring to the people taken from West Africa as "human cargo." His writings, along with pressure from Quakers, clergy, and segments of Copenhagen’s mercantile elite, helped steer Denmark toward reform. Notably, the Danish Crown’s decision was also influenced by practical concerns: declining profitability, rising African resistance, and the increasing risk of slave revolts.
While Fort Augustaborg’s architecture and purpose placed it squarely within this exploitative system, its actual role in the slave trade was comparatively limited. Historical estimates suggest that fewer than 1,000 captives were trafficked through the fort across its operational life — a stark contrast to sites like Elmina Castle, where more than 30,000 enslaved people are believed to have passed through its dungeons. Still, this numerical difference doesn't absolve the fort's complicity. What it does do is highlight its timing: a structure born on the edge of a collapsing moral justification for human trafficking.
That timing is where Fort Augustaborg becomes historically significant. Its construction, use, and legacy intersect with some of the earliest abolitionist activity in West Africa. Just west of Teshie, at Christiansborg Castle, Danish missionaries began preaching against the slave trade by the late 18th century. Their sermons, directed not just at European settlers but at Ga-Adangbe chiefs, introduced concepts of “free labor” — a framework that acknowledged African laborers' value but challenged the premise of enslavement. While these ideas were not universally accepted, they planted seeds for later labor negotiations, missionary schools, and Christianized legal frameworks that took root in southern Ghana during the 19th century.
In this light, Fort Augustaborg becomes an emblem of contradiction: a fort built for profit, yet operating under a flag that, within two decades, would reject the very trade it once enabled. The irony is not lost in local oral traditions. Elders in Teshie, whose ancestors lived under the shadow of the fort, speak of “the house the Danes built” not just as a place of danger, but as a site of negotiation — one that saw early confrontations not just over goods, but over values.
The fort still stands, though battered by time and tides. Its walls hold the weight of both exploitation and transition — a rare physical link to a moment when the world began, however slowly and unevenly, to reckon with the meaning of human rights.
Sources: